1-800-522-7274 AVAILABLE 24/7

Hablamos Español

Wilshire Law Firm Blog

What Is Wrong with Takata Airbags?

What Is Wrong with Takata Airbags?

What You Need to Know About the Takata Airbags

In the past few months, the automotive world has been faced with one recall after another. Of late, the focus has shifted to Takata airbag recalls from General Motors recalls. Takata is a Japan-based auto supplier which provided automobile manufacturers with almost 25% of the inflators utilized in activating airbags in case of an accident. Takata airbags faults are not just limited to a specific car manufacturer. They affect all car brands that were supplied with the airbags.

Though airbags have been quite helpful in minimizing the injuries that drivers and passengers are befallen with, recently uncovered faults pose a serious threat to motorists. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (federal agency accountable for automotive safety) has authorized Takata airbag recalls and has also expressed its concerns regarding the delays in Takata airbag recalls. Additionally, the Administration has urged Takata to hasten its production of completely safe airbag replacements.

Takata airbags have also been linked to numerous severe and minor injuries and at least eight deaths. The inflators utilized in faulty Takata airbags have the potential of sending metal chips into the torsos and faces of the drivers and passengers. If this, unfortunately, happens to you, you definitely need to seek professional advice. There are experienced car accident attorneys ready to represent you and make sure you are well compensated for this. All you need to do is to make that call.

The main issue regarding the Takata airbags is that they have the potential of severely injuring, maiming or even seriously wounding drivers and passengers. One of the most recent and greatest airbag recall involving more than 14 million cars was founded on revelations that the inflators used in the airbag were capable of bursting and sending shrapnel into the bodies of the passengers and drivers.

The Takata airbags are particularly dangerous in humid conditions and regions. In such environments, their possibility of malfunctioning when activated is quite high. Six different airbag rupturing events in the humid states like Florida and Puerto Rico have been compiled by NHTSA.

One of the mind-boggling questions that a lot of people ask themselves is if Takata knew that their airbags were dangerous.

According to allegations made by previous Takata employees, Takata Corporation might have first known about the airbags’ defects back in 2004. This particular date is actually five years earlier than the date that Takata actually shared with the NHTSA. The previous employees claim that Takata recovered airbags from junkyards and carried out tests on them to establish if the inflation tools in the airbags could rip open the airbag and cause harm. In the process of testing, Takata supposedly discovered defects and then supposedly instructed the employees to erase all proof of the airbag faults from the company’s computers. Additionally, these tests were done outside the usual work hours. It is as if it was some form of secret operation being carried out; it was definitely not intended for the public’s ears.

As the injuries and casualties linked to the Takata airbags continue to increase, more and more clients are actually filling potential lawsuits against the company. The complaints that have been so far filed state that the company failed to disclose safety faults in their airbags and that they also deliberately withheld this information from safety regulators and clients.

If either you or your loved one, could be a sibling, spouse, relative, or even friend, has been injured in an airbag connected incident, you need to contact skilled car accident attorneys at reputable law firms. These attorneys will make sure that your legal rights are met.

Spread the love
Posted in ,

Get Your Free Case Consultation

Main Consultation Form

Free Case Consultation
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.