Class Action

Dexcom G7 Class Action Lawsuit

Did you buy a Dexcom G7 Continuous Glucose Monitor after December 13, 2023? Wilshire Law Firm is investigating a class action against Dexcom, Inc. over its accuracy claims, and you may qualify. Contact us 24/7 for a free case review — there are no fees unless you get paid.

Dexcom G7 Class Action Lawsuit
  • $3B+RECOVERED
  • 7X"BEST LAW FIRM" AWARDS
  • 24/7AVAILABILITY & SUPPORT
  • 500+LEGAL PROFESSIONALS

Understanding Your Consumer Case

Explore essential resources on your rights, your options, and what to expect — everything you need to navigate the legal process, all in one place.

Wilshire Law Firm is pursuing legal action against Dexcom, Inc. over allegations that it falsely advertised the G7 Continuous Glucose Monitor as "the most accurate CGM system available." On March 4, 2025, the FDA issued a Warning Letter citing manufacturing problems, unapproved design changes to the sensor coating, and insufficient risk analysis — leading the agency to determine the devices were misbranded and adulterated.

According to the FDA Warning Letter, Dexcom's G7 had several serious issues: inadequate monitoring and validation during production, a major change to the sensor coating made without proper FDA clearance, and a lack of proper safety assessment for use with automated insulin dosing systems. The lawsuit alleges these problems contradicted Dexcom's accuracy claims, especially during rapid changes in glucose levels.

You may be eligible if you purchased a Dexcom G7 after December 13, 2023 and live in one of the following: Washington D.C., Pennsylvania, California, New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Washington, Illinois, Florida, Oregon, or New Mexico. Proof of purchase is required. A legal professional can confirm whether you qualify during a free case review.

Client Reviews


Wilshire Law Firm was very fast responding to me about my case… they were very nice and helpful and made sure I understood all of the facts. I would recommend [Wilshire Law Firm] for anyone who is looking for the best; they are number one. Thank you Wilshire and staff for making things feel easier.

Angela B.

Past results do not guarantee similar outcomes. Each case is unique and evaluated on its own facts.

Consumer Cases: How It Works

One Call. We Handle the Rest.

It starts with one call. From there, we handle everything, building your case, standing up to insurance companies and corporations, and fighting for your future. Here's how it works...

01

Contact us 24/7

Start your free case review by calling us or filling out our online form.

02

Powerhouse team on your side

If we're able to take your case, we'll take strong legal action to hold whoever harmed you accountable.

03

No fees unless you get paid

Whether through a settlement or trial, we'll fight to get you the financial recovery you're owed.

How Do I Know If I Qualify for the Dexcom G7 Lawsuit?

You may qualify if you purchased a Dexcom G7 Continuous Glucose Monitor after December 13, 2023, can provide proof of purchase, and live in an eligible state (including California, New York, Florida, Washington, Oregon, and others). Eligibility is decided case by case, so contact Wilshire Law Firm for a free evaluation to see whether you can join.

Start Your Free Consumer Case Review

4.9 out of 2,500+ reviews
  • Available 24/7
  • Hablamos Español
  • Nationally-Recognized Powerhouse Team
As seen in:

We'll contact you within minutes

No fees unless you get paid.

By submitting this form, you knowingly, voluntarily, and expressly consent to receive from Wilshire Law Firm telephone calls, emails, and SMS text messages, including those made using an automatic telephone dialing system (auto-dialer), artificial intelligence (AI), and/or pre-recorded or artificial voice messages. These communications are for the purpose of providing prompt consultation regarding your potential case. You understand that by providing your telephone number, you are granting permission to be contacted for this purpose, even if your number is on a federal or state Do-Not-Call registry. Consent is not required as a condition of retaining Wilshire Law Firm. Message and data rates may apply. You may revoke your consent to receive calls, texts, or emails at any time by replying “STOP” to any text message, calling 888-557-3271, filling out the form at wilshirelawfirm.com/do-not-contact or by any other reasonable method. For more information, refer to our Privacy Policy.

Record breaking results

Winners of #1 Settlements in California

Our attorneys have recovered billions of dollars, including some of the biggest settlements in California.

17#1 Settlements in California, 2022–2024*

TopVerdict #1TopVerdict.com #1 settlements

11 of 17

  • #1 Truck v. Pedestrian Accident Settlement — California (2024)

    #1 Truck v. Pedestrian Accident Settlement

    2024

  • #1 Multi-Vehicle Accident Settlement — California (2024)

    #1 Multi-Vehicle Accident Settlement

    2024

  • #1 Equipment Malfunction Settlement — California (2024)

    #1 Equipment Malfunction Settlement

    2024

  • #1 Car v. Stationary Object Collision Settlement — California (2024)

    #1 Car v. Stationary Object Collision Settlement

    2024

  • #1 Bus v. Passenger Accident Settlement — California (2024)

    #1 Bus v. Passenger Accident Settlement

    2024

  • #1 Whistleblower Retaliation Settlement — California (2023)

    #1 Whistleblower Retaliation Settlement

    2023

  • #1 Underinsured Motorist Settlement — California (2023)

    #1 Underinsured Motorist Settlement

    2023

  • #1 Slip & Fall Accident Settlement — California (2023)

    #1 Slip & Fall Accident Settlement

    2023

  • #1 Negligent Security Settlement — California (2023)

    #1 Negligent Security Settlement

    2023

  • #1 Ladder Accident Settlement — California (2023)

    #1 Ladder Accident Settlement

    2023

  • #1 Hotel Premises Liability Settlement — California (2023)

    #1 Hotel Premises Liability Settlement

    2023

  • #1 Car v. Car Collision Settlement — California (2023)

    #1 Car v. Car Collision Settlement

    2023

  • #1 Bicycle Accident Settlement — California (2023)

    #1 Bicycle Accident Settlement

    2023

  • #1 Pregnancy Discrimination Settlement — California (2022)

    #1 Pregnancy Discrimination Settlement

    2022

  • #1 Age/Disability Discrimination Settlement — California (2022)

    #1 Age/Disability Discrimination Settlement

    2022

  • #1 Wrongful Termination Settlement — California (2022)

    #1 Wrongful Termination Settlement

    2022

  • #1 Meal & Rest Breaks Settlement — California (2022)

    #1 Meal & Rest Breaks Settlement

    2022

*#1 settlements in California have been awarded by TopVerdict.com. Past results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Consumer FAQs

Our Most Frequently Asked Questions

We've answered the most common ones below. If yours isn't here, call us — we're available 24/7.

The case involves allegations that Dexcom marketed its G7 continuous glucose monitor as more accurate than it actually was, and it points to a U.S. Food and Drug Administration warning letter that cited manufacturing and quality concerns. The lawsuit seeks to hold the company accountable to consumers who purchased the device based on those accuracy claims. These are allegations, and the facts would be tested through the legal process.

Eligibility generally focuses on people who purchased a Dexcom G7 after a specific date and who live in one of the states currently included in the case. Because eligibility criteria can change as the litigation develops, the best way to know whether you qualify is to have your purchase and location reviewed. An attorney can confirm the current requirements.

In most product cases like this, you will generally need something showing that you purchased the device, such as a receipt, order confirmation, pharmacy record, or insurance statement. You do not need to have everything gathered before reaching out. An attorney can explain what documentation may support your participation.

A false-advertising class action combines the claims of many purchasers who allege they were misled about a product into a single case, which a court must certify before it can proceed on behalf of the group. If it succeeds, relief may include refunds or other compensation tied to the purchase. Because each person's individual losses may be modest, grouping the claims can make accountability practical.

Yes. Consumer and false-advertising claims carry statutes of limitations that can run from the purchase or from when the problem was discovered, and these windows can be shorter than people expect. Acting promptly helps protect your ability to take part. Because deadlines have exceptions, confirm the one that applies to you without delay.

Related Content

Guides, nearby offices, and related practice areas to consumer claims.

Locations

Find your nearest office — serving all of California and employment clients in Oregon and Washington.

Appointments required for office visits

Beverly HillsIrvineLos AngelesOaklandRiversideSacramentoSan DiegoTorrance