$6.8M
San Bernardino County wage and hour class action settlement: a class of employees alleged their employer failed to pay wages owed and sought related penalties.
Employment
Some pay problems affect only one person. Many don’t. If your lunch breaks keep getting cut short, there’s a good chance your coworkers’ are too. If the time clock rounds your hours down, it may be doing the same to everyone else on that system. When an employer breaks California’s pay rules, it often does so across a whole workforce at once. The Private Attorneys General Act, known as PAGA, can give one worker a way to hold the company accountable for all of it.
Wilshire Law Firm’s unpaid wages lawyers help California employees bring PAGA claims alongside their own wage claims. Case reviews are free and available 24/7, and there are no fees unless you get paid.

Explore essential resources on your rights, your options, and what to expect — everything you need to navigate the legal process, all in one place.
A PAGA claim lets one employee bring a case against an employer for Labor Code violations on behalf of the State of California and every coworker the violations affected. The Private Attorneys General Act took effect in 2004 because the state's labor enforcement agencies didn't have the staff to keep up. A worker steps into the state's shoes, brings the case, and recovers civil penalties the state could have collected itself.
Those penalties are separate from your own unpaid wages, which you can still pursue alongside them. A PAGA claim isn't a class action, and it doesn't require the court to certify a class. Most of the penalties go to the state and the rest to the affected employees, and if the claim succeeds, the employer pays the worker's reasonable attorney's fees. If something at your job seems to be happening to everyone, PAGA may fit.
Almost any Labor Code violation, which in practice often means everyday pay problems that can affect a whole shift at once. Common examples include:
Often the problem comes from a policy or a payroll system, so it can affect many people the same way. Our article on six ways your California employer may be breaking the law walks through them one at a time.
Any current or former employee who personally experienced the violations can bring one, and no, you don't have to still work there. The law calls this person an "aggrieved employee." Since the 2024 reform, that means you must have personally suffered each violation you raise, within the one-year filing period. Many PAGA claims come from former employees, who may feel freer to speak up, but retaliating against a current employee for bringing one is itself illegal.
One thing to check before anything else: if you signed an arbitration agreement, the part of the claim about you may be sent to arbitration while the part about your coworkers stays in court. Our article on arbitration agreements at work explains how that works.
Not with a lawsuit. It starts with a written notice to the state. Your lawyer files a PAGA notice through the Labor and Workforce Development Agency's online portal, with a $75 filing fee, and sends a copy to the employer by certified mail. The notice has to spell out the specific Labor Code sections violated and the facts behind them, so precision matters.
The agency then has 65 days to decide whether to investigate itself. If it doesn't take the case, you can generally file in court once it says so or that window closes. Within 33 days of the notice, an employer with fewer than 100 employees may send the agency a confidential proposal to cure many types of violations. A larger employer can ask the court to pause the case for an early evaluation conference when it first responds to the lawsuit. Having a lawyer look at it early can make for a stronger notice.
Civil penalties for every affected employee, for every pay period the violation occurred, plus attorney's fees if the claim succeeds and, in some cases, a court order making the employer change its practices. The default penalty is generally $100 per employee per pay period. It rises to $200 if a court or the agency found the same policy unlawful in the five years before the violation, or if the conduct was malicious, fraudulent, or oppressive. Lower penalties apply to brief, one-time problems and to pay stub errors where the correct information was still easy to find on the stub, and penalties are halved for employers who pay weekly.
Where the $100 default applies, a single unlawful policy affecting 150 workers paid every two weeks for a year comes to $390,000 before any reductions or any other violation. Of the civil penalties recovered, 65% goes to the state and 35% is divided among the affected employees. That is in addition to your own back wages, break premiums, and other damages.
Four things matter most for workers, and the changes apply to notices filed on or after June 19, 2024. First, the employees' share went up from 25% to 35% of the penalties. Second, standing got narrower: you must have personally suffered each violation you raise, within the one-year filing period. Third, employers gained ways to reduce penalties. A company that took all reasonable steps to comply before receiving a notice can have penalties capped at 15% of the maximum. One that takes all reasonable steps within 60 days after the notice can have them capped at 30%. Fourth, courts can now order the employer to stop the practice, not just pay for it.
PAGA claims are still available, but the reform means they may need to be built more carefully. A legal professional can walk you through what the reform means for your workplace.
Yes, and it's short: generally one year. The notice to the state has to be filed within one year of the last violation you personally experienced. Because each paycheck can be a new violation, the clock can restart while the problem continues, but once you leave the job or the practice stops, the year can pass quickly.
Your own wage claims usually carry longer deadlines, often three or four years, so a late PAGA notice doesn't end everything, but it can cost your coworkers the penalties. If you suspect a workplace-wide problem, talk to a legal professional before the year is up.
1 of 29
$6.8M
San Bernardino County wage and hour class action settlement: a class of employees alleged their employer failed to pay wages owed and sought related penalties.
$5.5M
Oakland wage and hour class action settlement: senior living facility employees alleged unpaid wages, meal and rest break violations and unreimbursed expenses in class and representative claims.
$4.0M
Hawthorne wage and hour class action settlement: a manufacturer's hourly employees alleged missed rest breaks, short or late meal periods and unpaid wages, plus unreimbursed work expenses.
$3.9M
Newport Beach wage and hour class action settlement: hourly manufacturing plant employees alleged late and interrupted meal and rest breaks and sought unpaid premium pay.
$3.5M
Camarillo wage and hour class action settlement: hourly employees alleged meal and rest period violations and sought unpaid wages plus the related premiums.
$3.5M
Alameda County wage and hour class action settlement: hourly workers at a security systems company alleged unpaid wages and meal and rest period violations, and sought break premiums.
$3.3M
Irvine wage and hour class action settlement: hourly employees of a products company alleged they were denied compliant meal and rest breaks and sought premium pay and expense reimbursement.
$3.1M
Torrance wage and hour class action settlement: retail store employees alleged unpaid wages and meal and rest period violations, seeking final pay, waiting-time penalties and expense reimbursement.
$3.0M
Thousand Oaks wage and hour class action settlement: a manufacturer's employees alleged unpaid pre-shift work and noncompliant meal and rest breaks, seeking break premiums and expense reimbursement.
$3.0M
Orange County wage and hour class action settlement: a healthcare employer's hourly workers alleged unpaid overtime and meal and rest break violations and sought premium pay and expense reimbursement.
$3.0M
San Diego wage and hour class action settlement: hourly employees alleged unpaid wages and break violations, pursuing meal and rest period premiums and repayment of work costs.
$2.8M
Riverside County wage and hour class action settlement: a restaurant franchise's hourly workers alleged unpaid wages and meal and rest period violations and sought to recover their work expenses.
$2.8M
Brentwood wage and hour class action settlement: an education provider's hourly staff alleged unpaid wages and meal and rest period violations and sought premium pay and expense reimbursement.
$2.5M
San Francisco County wage and hour class action settlement: hourly campus employees sought unpaid wages and work expense reimbursement, alleging meal and rest period violations.
$2.5M
San Jose wage and hour class action settlement: hourly car dealership employees alleged they were underpaid, denied proper meal and rest periods and not reimbursed for work expenses.
$2.5M
San Francisco County wage and hour class action settlement: hourly clinic staff alleged off-the-clock work, meal and rest period violations, unpaid premiums and unreimbursed work expenses.
$2.5M
San Leandro wage and hour class action settlement: hourly employees alleged unpaid overtime, unpaid wages and meal and rest period violations, and claimed break premiums and out-of-pocket costs.
$2.4M
Orange County wage and hour class action settlement: restaurant employees alleged a franchise operator failed to provide legally required meal and rest breaks or pay the premiums owed.
$2.2M
Los Angeles wage and hour class action settlement: hourly hospital employees alleged their employer failed to provide meal periods required by California law.
$2.1M
San Diego County wage and hour class action settlement: franchise restaurant workers alleged unpaid off-the-clock work, late meal and rest breaks without premium pay, and unreimbursed work gear.
$2.0M
Tulare wage and hour class action settlement: food processing employees alleged interrupted rest breaks without premium pay and no reimbursement for personal phones used for work.
$2.0M
Watsonville wage and hour class action settlement: hourly workers at an agricultural company alleged unpaid overtime, interrupted lunches and missing rest breaks during long shifts.
$1.6M
Barstow wage and hour class action settlement: hourly workers at a vehicle-services business alleged unpaid off-the-clock time, meal and rest break violations and unreimbursed uniform costs.
$910K
Gardena wage and hour class action settlement: hourly employees alleged they were denied meal and rest breaks without premium pay and had to cover supplies and phone costs.
$220K
Signal Hill wage and hour class action settlement: employees alleged they missed meal and rest breaks without receiving premium pay and were not paid for all time worked.
$200K
Hemet wage and hour class action settlement: hourly thrift store employees alleged meal and rest period violations, seeking premium pay, cell phone expense reimbursement and PAGA penalties.
$185K
Shasta County wage and hour settlement: an employee brought a representative claim on behalf of healthcare employees, alleging meal and rest period violations, unpaid wages and unreimbursed expenses.
$116K
San Diego wage and hour settlement: a restaurant employee alleged unpaid overtime from edited time sheets and straight-time pay for extra hours, plus missed meal and rest breaks.
$100K
Victorville wage and hour class action settlement: hourly restaurant employees alleged their employer left wages unpaid, violated meal and rest period rules and did not reimburse work expenses.
*Past results do not guarantee similar outcomes. Each case is unique and evaluated on its own facts.
View more resultsWhat is a PAGA claim?
Send it to someone who could use it, or copy it into ChatGPT, Gemini or your notes.
Record-breaking results
Our attorneys have recovered billions of dollars, including some of the biggest settlements in California.
17#1 Settlements in California, 2022–2024*
TopVerdict #1TopVerdict.com #1 settlements
1 of 17

#1 Truck v. Pedestrian Accident Settlement
2024

#1 Multi-Vehicle Accident Settlement
2024

#1 Equipment Malfunction Settlement
2024

#1 Car v. Stationary Object Collision Settlement
2024

#1 Bus v. Passenger Accident Settlement
2024

#1 Whistleblower Retaliation Settlement
2023

#1 Underinsured Motorist Settlement
2023

#1 Slip & Fall Accident Settlement
2023

#1 Negligent Security Settlement
2023

#1 Ladder Accident Settlement
2023

#1 Hotel Premises Liability Settlement
2023

#1 Car v. Car Collision Settlement
2023

#1 Bicycle Accident Settlement
2023

#1 Pregnancy Discrimination Settlement
2022

#1 Age/Disability Discrimination Settlement
2022

#1 Wrongful Termination Settlement
2022

#1 Meal & Rest Breaks Settlement
2022
*#1 settlements in California have been awarded by TopVerdict.com. Past results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
We've answered the most common ones below. If yours isn't here, call us — we're available 24/7.
Locations
Find your nearest office — serving all of California and employment clients in Oregon and Washington.
Appointments required for office visitsCall 213-754-1375 to schedule